Tuesday, December 16, 2008

What Would You Do?

We've all heard to story and seen the video...





A 29yr-old reporter reporting in Iraq for ab Arab satellite channel interrupted a press conference and threw his shoes at President Bush. Called him a dog, too.

We here in America may not recognize that these two things are indeed grave insults to our President. We see this goofy guy throwing shoes and Bush deftly ducks the assault.

In an extraordinary move (extraordinary for leaders in that part of the world, certainly) Bush calls off his security detail and makes a joke. The Iraquis take the man into custody. This act is against the law in Iraq and carries with it a seven year prison sentence. Whether or not the Iraqis choose to prosecute this foreigner is up to them.

I can only imagine what would have happened if it was Barack Obama in Bush's place that afternoon... So I asked my Twitter-friends, "Even though it's kinda old news, I wonder how would Obama have handled a shoe being thrown at him??"

Here's what some of them had to say...

Mortimas "he would have bobbed when he should have weaved"
BreakTheirBones "he would have stopped the shoe midflight with a Jedi mind trick."
DecidedlyRight "Well, Obama is severely lacking in machismo, so my guess is that he'd be taken to a hospital for observation. :)"
TracyCarol "Obama can walk on water, so a shoe shouldn't be a problem. Think how tragic would be for his followers to see him as mortal."

What do you say?

 

Join conversation here or at twitter.com.

Friday, December 5, 2008

FL State Student Council Pays For Ayers Speech

Florida State University invites unrepentant domestic terrorist William Ayers to speak. (h/t Michelle Malkin)

Today, we are all SEMINOLES. Let's take a few short moments to stand up for America.

Email your opinion about Ayers' speechmaking to our kids to the student council who approved it: http://sga.fsu.edu/

Be nice. No cussing. Remember, they're just kids (idiot kids, but still...)

 

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

We're All in Cosmo's World...

I'm sad to report that Cosmo, for whom this blog is named, has passed away.

He was a beloved member of our family for more than 13 years.

We were lucky enough for Cosmo to pick us when he was a wee one at 12 weeks old.

He was always a sport. The neighborhood kids nicknamed him "Wonderdog" for his abilities with frisbees.

He was our buddy, our 'Mo. We will miss him terribly until that day we see him again.


Perhaps now more than ever, we are all in Cosmo's World...

 

Monday, November 24, 2008

Overheard: What I'll Miss About Bush

I was watching the FOX News show Red Eye the other night. One of the guests was S.E. Cupp, author of the book "Why You're Wrong About The Right".

As luck would have it, it appears as though she will be a guest tonight, Nov 24, 3am -- set your TiVo's!

Here's what she had to say about the (alleged) indescretion of the Obama camp, spilling the beans regrading the private meeting he had with President Bush.

What is the deal with all that fancy-talk with Obama? Talking about, "Quid-Pro-Quo"... You know, that's what I'll miss about George Bush. With him, you know he's strictly a "tit-for-tat" guy.

You know, that is one of the many, many things I'll miss about Goerge Bush too.

 

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Brave Girl Conducts 'Tolerance Test'

The Chicago Tribune's John Kass wrote this facinating article (excerpt below). The piece follows the pre-election experiment conducted by Chicago teen Catherine Vogt. Her story is a lesson to us all...

"Tolerance Fails T-Shirt Test" by: John Kass, The Chicago Tribune

Catherine Vogt shows off her two t-shirts As the media keeps gushing on about how America has finally adopted tolerance as the great virtue, and that we're all united now, let's consider the Brave Catherine Vogt Experiment. Catherine Vogt, 14, is an Illinois 8th grader, the daughter of a liberal mom and a conservative dad. She wanted to conduct an experiment in political tolerance and diversity of opinion at her school in the liberal suburb of Oak Park. She noticed that fellow students at Gwendolyn Brooks Middle School overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama for president. His campaign kept preaching "inclusion," and she decided to see how included she could be. So just before the election, Catherine consulted with her history teacher, then bravely wore a unique T-shirt to school and recorded the comments of teachers and students in her journal. The T-shirt bore the simple yet quite subversive words drawn with a red marker: "McCain Girl" "I was just really curious how they'd react to something that different, because a lot of people at my school wore Obama shirts and they are big Obama supporters," Catherine told us. "I just really wanted to see what their reaction would be."

Read the whole thing...

Friday, November 14, 2008

A Necessary Rule-Breaker: Something Wicked This Way Comes

In every introductory debate class, students are issued the following warning, "Whomever brings up Hitler first, loses."

This is one of those instances where what is taught in school is absolutely true, relevant, and a helpful rule to recall whenever anybody is engaged in an exchange of ideas, be it a conversation, debate, or argument.

However, we also learn, "it is the exception that makes the rule."

I came across the essay below. It was published with the invitation to re-post. I decided to take them up on the offer, even though it breaks the first rule of debate by way of exception.

I spotted this at The Bitten Word. I have re-posted it here in its entirety.

# # #

SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES

From a comment on a post at Pat Dollard (H/T to Atlas Shrugs):

- + - + - + - + - + -

Will you please take the time to read this, and if you think it worthwhile, pass it along to your email list, and ask them to read it? Even if they voted, with all good intentions, for Mr. Obama?

I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied it all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten - fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learn just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the 700B we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people,” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?

We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?). We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is medicare and our entire government, our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about)–the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x ten. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.

And now we have elected a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe is more imporant.)

Mr. Obama’s winning platform can be boiled down to one word: change.

Why?

I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now.

This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning.

And I thought I would never be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s. In those times, the savior was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his “brown shirts” would bully them into submission. And then, he was duly elected to office, a full-throttled economic crisis at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government power, department by department, person by person, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side?He did it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the moneyless, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe, and across the world.

He did it with a compliant media–did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and . . . change. And the people surely got what they voted for.

(Look it up if you think I am exaggerating.)

Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though.

Don’t forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And in less than six years–a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency–it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.

Some people scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe–and why I believe it.

I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am.

- + - + - + - + - + -

It doesn't have to be this way for us, for America. We are not doomed to repeat history, because we are aware. Click over to the original post at Pat Dollard, read and listen [to Obama talk about a civil security force].

LEARN BE AWARE SPEAK OUT SHARE THE WEALTH OF INFORMATION

All the information is out there! Just because the nightly news is not informing you does not mean that you cannot be informed. If you don't know where to look, leave me a message in the comments or email me and I will gladly share my reader list with you. If we do not stop this tide now, it will quickly drown us. Obama did not just "burst onto the scene" or any such nonsense. This was and is a planned attack, and we are complacently allowing it under a veil of "change". Six years is all it took for Germany to be taken over from within. How long do you think it will take America with a leader like Barack Obama?

In six years, my oldest child will be 17. What do you think Mr. Obama will have planned for him?

Six years ...

# # #

Friday, October 31, 2008

Beware the Axis of Taxes

So much has been written about Barack Obama's slippery-slope of his so called "middle class tax cut." The very latest has Bill Richardson on the radio earlier today setting the bar at $120,000 (this is down from $250, $200, and $150k).

Aside for the 'all kinds of wrong' I see with the principals and reasoning behind Obama's "plan," I want to take a moment to point something out.

Barack Obama has tax and budget ideas. We've all heard about them. Many of us scoff at them; others of us praise them. But we would all be wise to remember how things REALLY work.

Presidents don't write laws (including bugets, taxes, etc). They have to ask Congress for these things.

Should Obama be elected to serve as our next President - God forbid - he will have to forward his ideas to Congress.

Whether or not we elect a (gulp) filibuster-proof Democrat majority, leaders Pelosi and Reid will take Obama's plan and use it as a STARTING POINT.

By the time the final package gets to a Prez Obama's desk, you can be sure that the spending will be higher, the tax thresholds will be lower (as evidenced by the already lowering thresholds).

If you think Obama's budget schemes are oppresive now, hang on to your wallets, guys. It's just the beginning.

The fallout from these ill-advised policies would be catastrophic to our economy.

By the time the Axis of Taxes gets through with us, we will long for the breezy fun days of President Carter. (those of us who will there will shiver appropriately)

Don't let it happen. Say no to the Axis of Taxes. Vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin.

UPDATE:Today, Nov 1, an Obama surrogate and former campaign manager for Dick Gephardt (remember him??) was interviewed on FOX News and refused to give any amount as the threshold for Obama tax cuts.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Be Careful What You Wish For...

There was a story I read once called "Lathe of Heaven." It its about a man who's dreams alter reality. In short, his dreams come true.

But in that peculiar way that minds work, his dream come true in ways that are unexpectedly... direct. It turns out his ability is like that of a genie: sure, you get what you want, but in the end, do you want what you get? 'Lathe' is available at fine bookstores everywhere - or you could just rent the movie. I recommend the book.

* * *

During the Carter Administration, there was an idea that it would be a good thing to make homeownership a right. After all, shouldn't everyone own a home?? As a means to that end, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) was created and signed into law. It basically made it a little easier for those people "on the bubble" to afford to buy a home.

In 1995, President Clinton signed into law a major expansion of the CRA that strong-armed banks into lending to uncreditworthy people. And it worked - people were able to buy a home with "no money down."

But what this action by the Democrats did was to effectively guarantee that home prices would rise. Everybody's homes became instantly more valuable because that pesky 20% down payment was no longer required.

Nobody really noticed until the tech bubble popped.

When 1999 changed to 2000 and a Yahoo stock dropped from $300 to $30, a lot of the money that wasn't lost found it's way into the real estate market. Why wouldn't it? A lot of very smart people realized that there was a ton of money on the table. They were right.

As the real estate sector rallied, competition for those mortgage dollars increased, the guidelines were loosened. More and more and more people could qualify for no-doc loans.

It was a win-win: Banks were investing in the value of the property, not the borrower. As annual appreciation rates broke through the double-digit barrier, the banks were happy. So what if a borrower failed? They'd just sell the property for 15-20% more than they paid for it last year. The bank's debt is cured, and the borrower can take that money, buy another home, and try again.

Even though President Bush sounded the alarm in 2000, and McCain sounded the alarm again in 2003-4, Democrats consistently shouted them down. They said, in effect, "Move along, move along... there's nothing to see here..."

In the fall of 2005, the first whiff of trouble rippled through the real estate market. By 2006, the slowdown was palpable. In 2007, real estate professionals knew the jig was up. The ones who didn't sell in '06, sold their homes, rented, and waited.

Now, in 2008, we are in full-frontal crash mode. We could have done something to stop this crash, but the Democrats blocked every attempt. Their zeal to give away homes to a minority of people who couldn't pay trumped their oath to serve and protect all their constituents.

So, wish number one was "gee, I wish it was easier to buy a home" Granted! But now home prices have risen to crazy-high levels because money's so cheap.

Wish number two was "man, home prices are so high; I wish they would come down!" Granted! The real estate bubble has burst, and home prices have fallen as much as 60% in some areas.

* * *

Meanwhile, people said, "boy, I wish the minimum wage was higher... that would be sweet."

At the same time, people thought that one of the things contributing to the American trade deficit was an expensive dollar. I wished the dollar would come down in price so that American goods would be more competitve in the world market. We'd sell more and better products to the world market and that would be a good thing.

Granted! But the combination of many things, including falling dollar and higher labor costs contributed to higher oil prices (oil is priced in dollars), an overall CPI increase of, like, 6% in one year, and an unemployment rate of 6.1% (up from 4.8% last year). Ask a small business owner why this matters.

* * *

You Will ChangeThen people thought, "You know, these gas prices are crazy - I wish they would come down. There's no way oil should be at $130 a barrel; it should be at, like, $80"

Granted! The price of oil started to fall... a lot! Yesterday, it traded in the $80-90-per-barrel range. Oops, the price of oil dropped so drastically because of (well-founded) fears of worldwide recession.

* * *

So here we are, 20-something days from the 2008 elections. I hear a lot of people saying, "Gosh, I wish things would change. I want change so much. Change, change, change, change, change..."

Well, here are the choices: one guy who has done a lot over a long time versus another guy who has done very, very little over a very small amount of time. Both guys talk about 'change.'

Considering the realities of this election, there will certainly be change.

What we need to consider, however, that we choose the right change.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Gwen Ifill, Step Down!

So, the moderator of the Vice-Presidential debate Thursday night has a vested, commercial interest in the success of an Obama win. It's been announced, with only a couple of days before the debate, that her book, Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.

"Oh, but she's fair, she's experienced, she's done this before..." Yeah, yeah, yeah, I've heard it all before. Even if she is as fair as Solomon and as balanced as Lady Justice herself, she still has a vested, commercial interest in the election of a running candidate.

I've heard some chatter about how the McCain campaign didn't know about the book - like somehow that matters. My question is, how incompetent is the The Commission on Presidential Debates? Did they not know about Ifill's book? Or did they just not care? Did they not think the fact that the moderator of the debate - the one who is responsible for framing the debate by the questions asked - who has a direct, personal, business interest in the outcome of the election - would be an issue? For goodness sakes, the woman's publisher is releasing the book on Inauguration Day!

Imagine for a moment if Brit Hume were set to moderate the vp debate, and he announced a book called, The Hero in Office: The Life of John McCain. My ears are already ringing at the caterwauling we would hear on the Left. And you know what? The Right wouldn't like it either. And you know what else? They would both be right!

Some would say that any complaining about this clearly bogus (or incompetent - you pick) decision by the Commission to allow Gwen Ifill to take the stage for tomorrow's debate is a sign of weakness or low confidence. To use a phrase I've heard a little bit this election cycle: Spare me.

I am so sick and tired of the Right being given a hot, steamy pile of dung and then getting chastised for saying, "Hey, this is a hot pile of crap!" Well, it is!

Look, nobody said life was fair - but Americans should absolutely expect - demand! - that certain things in their life be fair. These things include:

Media Presentations called "News Reports"
Debates
Elections
Judges
Job & Housing Opportunities
There's more, I know but you get my gist

The Commission on Presidential Debates should work swiftly to replace Gwen Ifill. Actually, Ms Ifill should step down citing a conflict of interest - but I wouldn't expect her to do such a magnanimous thing.

 
If you go to the website, you'll find it's kinda tricky to find out who is on the Commission. Well, here's a the list of people who are currently serving on their Board... (I've included links to explain who they are)
Howard Buffett 
John C Danforth 
Antonia Hernandez 
Caroline Kennedy 
Michael D. McCurry 
Newton N. Minow 
Dorothy Ridings 
Alan K. Simpson 
H. Patrick Swygert 

The person running this whole thing, apparantly is the elusive Janet H Brown - Executive Director. Her email address is: jb@debates.org; her Phone# is (202) 872-1020 . Why don't we take a quick moment to let Ms. Brown that giving the moderator job for a vice-presidential debate to somesone with a person money interest in the outcome of the election is a (a-hem) BAD IDEA.

Of course, after reviewing the Board, it's no great surprise that things are working out this way...

Here's a short piece Ms Ifill did recently to promote her book...

The Breakthrough: Gwen Ifill - The most amazing videos are a click away

Who might be a good replacement? Well, how about Brit Hume? Hugh Hewitt? Fred Barnes and Mort Kondrake? Chris Wallace? Ben Stein?  Joe Lieberman?

If you have a suggestion, let me know!

Ms. Executive Director, if you're too busy, email me directly at cosmoxgram@gmail.com, leave your direct phone number so I can get the pertenant details, and I'll set the new moderator up myself. Heck, I'll even pay for the plane tickets! (if anybody else would be willing to chip in, let me know...)

As the Democrat nominee likes to say a lot: Enough is enough. And I, for one, have had enough.

 

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Puffery & Our Would-Be President

When I came across this a couple of days ago, I thought, "Oh, this will be interesting."

I expected to read about how Barack Obama really worked at XYZ for "2 years," instead of the "3 and a half years" he said -- you know, garden variety puffery we hear about in our everyday lives.

I was shocked to read the extent of Obama's exaggerations.

If some guy was interviewing me for a job and I found out the extent of his, well, fibs, I would give the guy a "thanks-but-no-thanks."

See, these distortions are bold, outrageous, and unnecessary. That this is what the guy leads with makes him untrustworthy.

If this is the level of distortion he will go to in order to get the job, what standard - or lack thereof - will he hold to keep it?

Here's a snippet from this middle...

"Here’s Barack’s account:

"Eventually a consulting house to multinational corporations agreed to hire me as a research assistant. Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office and sat at my computer terminal, checking the Reuters machine that blinked bright emerald messages from across the globe. As far as I could tell I was the only black man in the company, a source of shame for me but a source of considerable pride for the company’s secretarial pool.

"First, it wasn’t a consulting house; it was a small company that published newsletters on international business. Like most newsletter publishers, it was a bit of a sweatshop. I’m sure we all wished that we were high-priced consultants to multinational corporations. But we also enjoyed coming in at ten, wearing jeans to work, flirting with our co-workers, partying when we stayed late, and bonding over the low salaries and heavy workload."

Read the whole thing...

It's no wonder Obama punted the financial crisis. He's got nothing.